Saturday 10 January 2009

Solutions...

As the economy slips into a deeper recession by the day, the rate at which new 'solutions' to the crisis appear to be growing exponentially. Along with this, they also seem to be becoming increasingly desperate.

An issue (to me anyhow) is that it appears the same people who looked the other way, by ignorance or by design, when the problems were growing between 2001 and 2007 are now the same ones telling us that they have the 'solutions'. Errmmm.... Ohhhkayyy...

I've found a useful acid test when one of these 'solutions' is announced is to consider how we would switch them off when things have returned to normal. If it is difficult to see how they would switch it off without causing catastrophe then you have an idea that is likely to be poorly conceived and short-termist. Here's 2 pertinent examples:

1. Printing money - Usually, printed money leads to further misallocation (i.e. badly spent on things like failing companies or the public sector) making the problem worse. This means 'good' companies struggle to compete and also the budget deficit (government spending gap) becomes bigger and cannot be funded without crippling tax rates. Switching the printing presses off therefore leads to bigger problems downstream, reducing the motivation to stop printing. Viscious circle formed. (all of the above assumes your currency is not spanked by the markets first!)

2. Lower interest rates - Low interest rates in recent years have encouraged too much credit. Now the economy can't take 10% rates. Arguably now we can't even take 5%. But 5-10% has been normal for the last 50 years. How do we get back from 1.5% to more normal values. Dear knows!! Oh I know, a lot of pain downstream...

I'd argue that these mistakes have already been done to death. Now we've found we can't get back to normal. Since 2001, too much money has been injected. Our leaders (globally) had the chance to nip it in the bud in 2003 and 2005 but chose not too because there was a risk of recession if they did. They might become unpopular and get voted out. Now, don't we all wish we could turn back the clocks....
(2005 was such a missed opportunity for the UK - I get very frustrated that we chose to reduce rates then when we had the chance to avoid the worst consequences of what we have now)

As solutions come thick and fast, think of how we get back to normal in the long term before concluding whether it is 'the right thing for hard working families' now. Sometimes doing nothing is the better option...

3 comments:

  1. Another question that people should be asking along with how we get back to "normal" may be more immediate...

    Who can lend all the money?

    This isn't so much about how high interest need to be, or how it would be paid back, it is more pragmatic... Simultaneously, every industrialized country now has a plan which involves borrowing massively ($trns and $trns) but the global banking system is horribly short on capital, chinese savers are about to be slammed by the downturn, the oil price is slashing the swfs and western employees are about to watch their pension funds being toasted. So fundamentally where could the money come from if everyone wants to borrow at the same time?

    Perhaps only printing presses...

    ...but if so, should they be used to shore up a discredited banking system or to directly invest in spending and investment that is currently going to be funded (anyway) with this borrowed money?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This answer may seem a bit of a cop-out but it probably holds:

    They'll do whatever is politically and socially expedient rather than what is right.

    For the meantime, I suspect they will do the shoring up option. Nationalising the banking system is part of what I'd regard as the 'Nuclear option', ie starting from scratch. We're not at that point.... yet!!

    Governments will only take a tough decision if there is no alternative - the easy option will have to be exhausted or openly accepted as being discredited.

    The only other way is a change of government in whatever country - the US being an obvious current example.

    Considering the latest step down only occurred 3-4 months ago, I'm amazed how quickly things have gone pear-shaped. Most people who have given it thought now realise that there is a serious solvency issue at play - hence why printing money is being talked about openly.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Have you come across this "solution"?

    http://www.thenewmortgagecompany.com/crisissolved.html

    I can see the appeal, although it all seems a bit "easy"...

    ReplyDelete